I digress.

Readings: "Epiphenomenal Qualia" by Frank Jackson, and "What Experience Teaches" by David Lewis Issue: Lewis's Ability Hypothesis--a counterexample? As far as I understand, the Ability Hypothesis objection that Lewis brings to Jackson is in a way adopting a Skinnerian understanding of what knowledge is--that the knowledge of the experience of red "just is the possession of these abilities to rem..

On Thomas Nagel's "What is it like to be a bat?" I do agree with Nagel that the subjective character of conscious experience is the crux of mental states, and that at first glance it does not easily admit of reduction to physical or causal-functional properties. However, despite the seeming intractability of such subjective character, I nonetheless think that we can be rather optimistic about wh..

Issue: Understanding defined as capability seems to justify the systems+robot reply There seem to be two distinct senses of understanding that may be relevant (and lacking for the man) in the Chinese room thought experiment--an intentional aspect that connects the syntactical elements to semantics, and the cognitive phenomenology aspect of understanding ("what it feels like to understand," if an..

Suggestion: Spatiotemporal grain of functional/causal realization? I do think that Block presents a strong intuitive (="prima facie") reason not to accept functionalist accounts of mental states. As is defined, it seems that functionalism, or machine-state functionalism, cannot adequately provide reasons for rejecting that the homunculi-headed brain or the system of Chinese nationals have mental..

For this assignment, I'd like you to explain in 1-2 pages ( between 300 and 500 words) where Huxley diverges from Descartes, whether in his reasoning, his assumptions, or his evidence. For Descartes, his main corpus of evidence are the results of introspection and meditation, and his main mode of reasoning can be characterized as being deductive and principle based. On the contrary, Thomas Huxle..

For this reading, you might think about the methodological perspective with its focus on behavior that is displayed (in different ways) by both Turing and Skinner. What are its virtues and weaknesses? What, if anything, do such behaviorist commitments leave out? Or, to ask the question from the other side, why should we care about anything beyond what is capable of generating behavioral conseque..

Most criticisms of the imitation game focus on the insufficiency of the game as a criterion of thinking; in other words, they say that there is more to thinking than just being able to pass the imitation game and satisfy Turing's operational definitions. But I thought of the following case which points out the limitation of the imitation game from another perspective, namely that the imitation m..

이제 웬만하면 쓰는 글들을 블로그에도 업데이트 해둬야겠다. 수업 과제부터 고고링 Issue: on the incompleteness of Huxley's explanation with regards to free will In his discussion of the hypothesis that animals are automata, Huxley proposes a version of epiphenomenalism, which can be summarized as the view that "the consciousness of brutes would appear to be related to the mechanism of their body simply as a collateral product of it..

1) 원자화된 표상 거부 원자화된 표상representation 단위로 인지·마음을 연구하는 것은 원자화된 개인 단위로 사회를 연구하는 것과 마찬가지다. 인지를 포함한 경험은 총체적 분석에서부터 시작해야 한다. 의식이라는 총체에서 개별 표상들이 분화되고 개별화되는 것이지, 단순한 원자화된 표상의 총합이 의식을 구성하는 것이 아니다. 의식 또는 주관적 경험은 이런 의미에서 방법론적으로 환원불가능하다. 비판적 실재론적 사회과학에선 방법론적 개인주의를 비판하며 사회적 관계를 중심으로 사회를 파악하고자 한다. 비판적 실재론적 의식과학에선 표상주의를 비판하며 어떤 관계에 초점을 맞출 수 있을까? 표상들간의 관계? 또는 의식적 경험의 단위(총체)가 그 단위 바깥의 환경과 맺는 관계? 후설의 말을 빌려보자: "다양체..

**Definitions Here, consciousness means qualia--the "what it feels like to be" portion of experience. Temporal consciousness therefore would be defined as "what it feels like to feel time, or temporality." Temporality denotes a range of phenomena that includes but is not limited to the passage of time, change or duration, order or simultaneity in events, etc. **GoalMy ultimate goal is to delinea..